Research Papers Published In International Journals

After that, you should read the text at least twice, asking yourself the following questions: 1st “Is this information relevant to tell my story”?2nd Is this information relevant to transmit the key message of my work?The major challenge is that Science should be made to reach a wide audience.

Tags: Apa EssaysEssays On Strictly BallroomAp English Language Sample EssaysTsunami Research PaperEmail Cover Letter InternshipFree Download Thesis And DissertationThesis Page Numbering ApaIs Marriage A Lifelong Commitment Essay

Then, when the manuscript is in a final draft I ask for 3 evaluations using a Likert scale (1 – not easy to understand the scope and impact of the manuscript; to 5 – very clear to understand the scope and impact of the manuscript).

These evaluations are requested to colleagues from different disciplines.

” You should pay close attention to these questions in each topic of your manuscript (e.g., introduction, material and methods, discussion).

If your answer is positive, keep the information in the text; if not, simply delete it.

While it may seem difficult it is a very important step that all researchers should keep in mind, opening new possibilities for multidisciplinary approaches.

When preparing the first draft, I try to elaborate some infographics that will help me to keep the manuscript clear and concise.

Only 5 to 10% of the manuscripts received by the journals with good impact factor are published (or accepted for publication). How can we improve the probability of our “story” to be read or published? We need a good “story”, based on a concise and clear message.

Although this idea sounds logical, a common problem that we (scientific writers) face is to summarize our complex work into a manuscript, since we usually handle with several major findings.

We submitted this paper to five different journals in succession to conform to publication regulations.

The first journal took over 6 months to get back to us with a rejection after external peer review; the paper was not a proper fit for the journal.